Scott, David (2007) Critical Realism and Statistical Methods: A Response to Nash. British Educational Research Journal, 33 (2). pp. 141-154. ISSN Print: 0141-1926 Online: 1469-3518
|
PDF (Critical Realism and Statistical Methods: A Response to Nash)
Scott2007critical141.pdf Download (130Kb) | Preview |
Abstract
This article offers a defence of critical realism in the face of objections Nash (2005) makes to it in a recent edition of this journal. It is argued that critical and scientific realisms are closely related and that both are opposed to statistical positivism. However, the suggestion is made that scientific realism retains (from statistical positivism) a number of elements that result in misleading accounts of social processes and events: indicators are used which do not reflect the close relationship between structure and agency; indicators refer to reified and not real properties of both structures and agents; and indicators do not refer to causal properties of objects and entities. In order to develop a narrative of causal processes, as Nash argues researchers should, then some adjustments need to be made to the principles that underpin scientific realism.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | This is an electronic version of an article published in Scott, David (2007) Critical Realism and Statistical Methods: A Response to Nash. British Educational Research Journal, 33 (2). pp. 141-154. British Educational Research Journal is available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/01411920701208167 |
| Subjects: | Departments > Learning, Curriculum and Communication |
| Depositing User: | IOE Repository Editor (2) |
| Date Deposited: | 27 May 2010 15:16 |
| Last Modified: | 26 Jun 2012 22:36 |
| URI: | http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/5569 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
