IOE EPrints

An emerging framework for including different types of evidence in systematic reviews for public policy

Oliver, Sandy and Harden, Angela and Rees, Rebecca and Shepherd, Jonathan and Brunton, Ginny and Garcia, Jo and Oakley, Ann (2005) An emerging framework for including different types of evidence in systematic reviews for public policy. Evaluation, 11 (4). pp. 428-446. ISSN 1356-3890

Full text not available from this repository.
SFX image for help Not from IOE? image for help
Item Type: Article
Additional Information: a. Research synthesis methodology b. Methodological reflections on a series of rigorous substantive reviews addressed: the interrelationship between review questions, relevant theory and values within the review process; methodological similarities and differences with more conventional reviews of effectiveness; the added value in terms of conclusions and specific recommendations; and the relevance to public policy. c. Meets a pressing need for integrating different types of evidence to inform public policy and practice. Traces the development of an innovative method for synthesising the findings of diverse study designs. d. Influencing international methodology for systematic reviews: cited by the European Commission funded consensus-based review protocol for health promotion and public health (HP/PH) topics e. Methodological reflections based firmly on empirical reviews of studies that were systematically sought, appraised and their findings synthesised. f. Peer review coordinated by international journal g. First author, led the methods development and reflections
Controlled Keywords: Not age specific, Cross-national, Non specific setting, Systematic review
Divisions: IOE Departments > Departments > Social Science Research Unit
Depositing User: IOE Repository Editor (1)
Date Deposited: 28 Apr 2010 15:21
Last Modified: 14 Oct 2013 11:47
URI: http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/3687
View Item View Item